Paint BidTracker

Project Intelligence for the Painting Industry

A Product of Technology Publishing
JPCL | PaintSquare | Durability + Design | Paint BidTracker

Sign-up for a Free Trial...or Login
Email/Username* Password*
Follow us on Twitter  |   Join us on Facebook
About Paint BidTracker | Contact Us | Advertise | Search

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page

U.S. Drives for Less Rust on the Road

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Comment | More

Is there a solution to the thousands of miles of guardrails rusting away along U.S. highways?

The federal government is gambling yes, with a new request for proposals to find the best method.

The U.S. Transportation Research Board’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) has issued an RFP to determine and compare the corrosion resistance of guardrail materials prepared by continuous and hot dip galvanization using accelerated corrosion testing.


ASTM's Salt Fog test is not a good predictor of real-world corrosion, the TRB says.

Proposals are due Jan. 25. The agency wants a $90,000 fixed-price contract.

Guarding Guardrails

The agency notes that all state highway agencies use galvanized guardrail manufactured to the AASHTO M 180 Specification as part of roadway safety elements.  A number of agencies permit both hot dip batch and continuous galvanization of W-beam guardrail elements.

In the hot dip batch process, guardrail elements are fabricated, followed by hot-dip galvanizing application. In the continuous process, the steel is repeatedly galvanized and then fabricated to manufacturer guardrail elements resulting in bare steel exposed to the elements at cut edges and punched holes.

“These coating types and coating thicknesses have been compared in the past using the ASTM B-117 Salt Fog test,” the Research Board notes. “However, this test does not directly correlate to corrosion seen in real world environments.”

Corrosion Comparisons

The agency wants a head-to-head comparison of the corrosion protection afforded by both methods.


The Transportation Research Board wants to compare the corrosion resistance of guardrail materials prepared by continuous and hot dip galvanization.

Engineers will submit proposals that are broken down into three tasks:

  • Prepare a laboratory experiment;
  • Conduct accelerated corrosion testing and analyze results; and
  • Present a final report that summarizes findings, draws conclusions and presents proposed guidance.

Proposals will be evaluated by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program.The work is scheduled to begin about March 1.

Reported by Paint BidTracker, a construction reporting service devoted to identifying contracting opportunities for the coatings community.


Tagged categories: Bridges; Corrosion protection; Corrosion resistance; Galvanized steel; Paint BidTracker; Roads/Highways; Transportation

Comment from Tom Schwerdt, (1/3/2013, 8:13 AM)

That second photo really looks like either brown-painted or weathering-steel guardrail. Typically that's what parks guys want (especially national parks) - they just love brown. There are significant drawbacks to weathering steel guardrail.

Comment from James Johnson, (1/4/2013, 1:20 PM)

The problem described could be resolved for free if the FHWA people would use a little common sense. Since it is well known the corrosion is from deicing salt they 1) Could quit using salt and go back to sand or cinders. They are less costly and readily available and far less of a health risk. There is mounting evidence that high chloride levels may be contributing to breast cancer, and if this is true it could also be contributing to other types of cancer. 2) Since the protective coating is shop applied they could make use of automotive painting technology as factory automotive finishes hold up to the same conditions as guard rail but outlast guard rail many times over. It might even be cheaper.

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Wasser High-Tech Coatings Inc.
Wasser Coatings Protect

Wasser Coatings offer a complete range of Moisture Cure Urethane (NEPCOAT approved) systems in addition to Polyurea membranes and linings(NSF).

W Abrasives
Steel Abrasives from
W Abrasives

As the global leader in steel abrasives, W Abrasives material is the efficient and eco-friendly solution blasting with you to reach the perfect profile.

Safespan Platform Systems, Inc.
SAFESPAN Blast & Paint Work Platforms

The industry standard for bridge access, containment, and shielding. New labor saving components now available.

Eagle Industries
Your Containment Specialists

Eagle is a well-known leader servicing the industrial painting and coatings industry with Containment and Ventilations Solutions. 800.266.8246

Blastox/The TDJ Group, Inc.
Blastox - One Step
Lead Abatement

Don't waste money on added labor steps with other methods. Don't mix, meter or apply at the job-site. Avoid strict hazardous waste rules.
Let your painters paint

POLYGON - Temporary Humidity Control

We specialize in innovative climate control solutions for industrial painting, utilizing alternative energy sources and combining desiccants with heating or cooling.

The one way to control
a tank: DRYCO

Temporary climate control equipment. Dehumidifiers,
Heaters, A/C, Power, More…
Call: 866-379-2600

Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker JPCL Europe

USE Paint BidTracker:      Get a Free Trial
EXPLORE Paint BidTracker:      Project Showcase   |   Blogs   |   Social   |   News   |   Webinars   |   White Papers   |   Links   |   Standards   |   Classifieds
KNOW Paint BidTracker:      FAQ   |   About Paint BidTracker   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us

© Copyright 2000 - 2015, Technology Publishing, Co., All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail